Trump's EPA reforms are a huge boost to manufacturers, but there's more red tape to cut: expert

Trump Administration Rolls Back Biden‑Era Power‑Plant Emissions Rules; Manufacturers Respond Positively
WASHINGTON — The Trump administration announced last week that it would eliminate a group of power‑plant emissions standards that had been rolled out by the Biden administration. The move, executed by the Environmental Protection Agency under Administrator Lee Zeldin, was described by the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) as a “game changer” for the U.S. economy.
The rules in question were part of a broader climate strategy that sought to reduce greenhouse‑gas and particulate‑matter emissions from large fossil‑fuel power plants. Industry groups, however, had long complained that the regulations were “simply unworkable” and that the timelines set for compliance were “not feasible.” NAM’s chief executive, Jay Timmons, said the new decision sent a clear message that the Trump administration was “listening to our concerns.”
“I think we all share that. I know the current EPA and Administrator Zeldin certainly share those objectives, but how you get there really matters and whether manufacturers are able to meet the challenge,” Timmons told Fox News Digital. He added that the Biden administration had heard the industry’s complaints but had chosen to proceed with the standards.
The repeal was carried out by executive fiat, meaning it was enacted without the need for congressional approval. While the immediate impact is a sudden easing of regulatory burdens for manufacturers that rely on power plants, Timmons cautions that the most durable changes will have to come through legislation. “Uncertainty is the absolute worst enemy for manufacturers because manufacturers are on a very long‑term horizon when it comes to planning and strategy, product development, research and development,” he said. “When administrations change, there has often been kind of that pendulum swing.”
Beyond emissions, the industry’s pain points include the permitting process. NAM’s recent polling found that 80 % of manufacturers view the length and complexity of permitting as a major hurdle to increased investment. Nearly nine in ten—87 %—said they would expand business operations, hire more workers, or raise wages and benefits if permitting were streamlined.
“These are not just abstract numbers,” Timmons said. “If the permitting process could be made faster and more predictable, we would see real growth.” He called for “more opportunities for business to be at the table” when Congress drafts new legislation, emphasizing that manufacturers can contribute to cleaner air, water, and healthier communities while still advancing economic goals.
The decision to roll back the standards comes amid a broader push by the Trump administration to cut what it calls “red tape” for businesses. While industry leaders welcome the move, environmental advocates warn that the repeal could reverse progress on climate and air‑quality goals. The long‑term economic impact remains uncertain, as the industry’s response will depend on how quickly Congress can translate these executive changes into permanent policy.
For now, the elimination of the Biden‑era power‑plant rules appears to be a win for manufacturers, offering immediate relief from compliance costs while underscoring the need for clearer, more business‑friendly regulatory frameworks in the future.

