Right to repair should apply to electronics, other tech | Letter

When we’re sick, and just one opinion does not sit well, we don’t see just one doctor. We get a second opinion, compare treatment options and choose someone we trust with our body.

So, why don’t we have the same freedom over the things we own? Because if something we own breaks and we can’t fix it ourselves, or choose among repair shops competing on price and quality, do we actually own that item? Or are we simply leasing it from the manufacturer, on their terms?

Too many everyday electronics and appliances are designed with planned obsolescence. Just two prime examples include the FTC v. John Deere settlement over subliminal tactics to avoid releasing the necessary parts and tools around the right to repair.

When companies restrict access via proprietary screws and repair manuals locked behind legal teams, it ensures that we, the consumers, are forced to replace rather than repair.

Right to repair is simple: People should be able to fix what they own, either by themselves or through a shop of their choosing. Mainers already agree. In 2023, voters passed the automotive right to repair by a vote of 84–16.

This spring, a bill covering the right to repair of electronics and appliances cleared the Senate and came within two votes of passing the House. Our sponsor, Sen. Mike Tipping of Orono, has moved it through the Senate twice and remains committed to seeing this bill passed. Let’s unite to give this bill the push it needs.

Deklin Fitzgerald
Portland

Copy the Story Link

Tagged: featured letter, letter to the editor